The government's days, or not. These are days of the count, talks, games on the thin edge of a razor. One day, Berlusconi seems doomed, the next day it is not more. For days, rumors about the encounter took place between the radicals and a delegation of the PDL. In fact, not entirely discount the radical vote of no confidence to the Berlusconi government, indeed, crunch the numbers and range of continuous uphill and downhill. The radicals, always at center stage, in dribs and drabs to make more noise than a herd of cattle. It is not excluded that the six radicals to the chamber can be decisive in this perverse game of fudicie and distrust, trust in government by voting. Pannella
leave us on edge, you will not know anything until the fateful December 14. I will be in Berlin, and m'auguro comforting to hear when I return.
course, would be a nice return and find joke even his feet, Mr B. Why did the radicals would be lowered when this game? They always had their way of seeing and doing politics, so not surprising they have ping pong. Not that this is condemned as a whole: they are the party of pragmatism, struggling to clear targets. Rather than a party from the government, are a party struggling to get pressure on concrete targets. By doing so you do not get caught a lot of sympathy, and the casual observer is bound to condemn them. Who knows them esteem and respect them, but even the most faithful can knit his brow in some cases.
seems Pannella have explicitly requested, proposing a vote of confidence in return or at least abstention; obviously need to see how these tales by newspaper is true. The fact is that the confidence is not something as obvious as it seems.
The radical demands ranging from prisons to the electoral reform issue to achieve a bipolar system to English, the reform of the judiciary in the separation of the careers of pm to the "democratization of rai" for equal access to public television. Rai
If the land is viable and the Judiciary, the other two claims, the road is impassable: Pannella asked amnesty. Again? We do, we ask each one five years? If the first did not solve the problem, how can he do the second? You can trade a voting for a bad government for an amnesty from the questionable results? If there is a problem with prisons, this is not the way to salvation. Also, Berlusconi is not railed against the amnesty proposed by the left, making it a workhorse for obtaining consent? Now, would change the perspective for a narrow confidence? What do not you go to earn bread.
Without the problem of inadequate prisons, are the other three points. The radicals are extravagant types, but the proposals are always serious and often intelligent. Remains unknown: how the request then correspond to the actual realization? You know, when you are pressuring the proposals are acceptable, but almost never match the original idea, and then agreements leave the time they find. To deal with some characters you have to go cautious: the guarantee of the realization is there?
Provided finally, that Berlusconi and his men, taken by an excess of gratitude decided to please the radicals, we can say of us won? These four objectives, concrete and achievable, seem to offer a poor exchange to Italy in exchange for a continuation of this government.
There would probably be at least the possibility that radicals may influence decisive and not just the conduct of future government, put vetoes and determine from time to time the majority and minority. Who knows! Certainly, the radicals do vote along with the league would be a hard, hard blow.
0 comments:
Post a Comment