"Daniel Nicolosi, aka Bros, I condemn in the future you and your fellow men because it does not matter artististico the value of your bottle: For us it is a crime. "
Although the first trial of a graffiti artist has ended with the acquittal, the judge in Milan has established the principle that bans any work of writers. This applies not only to those works - or rather scribbles - that smear our subways, leaving a hint on the shutters or the gray and decaying ridge of a building. The sentence was also extended to those graffiti that have a high artistic value. So now no matter whether the graffiti in question was or was not eligible to be considered as a viable urban Sgarro the decor (which?), Even if your name was Pablo Picasso's what you do could be considered vandalism. Indeed, without the graffiti vandalism is certainly could change that "the aesthetic appearance and the sharpness attributed to the good." And why not add that it is vandalism everything from color to life? Why not add that this is vandalism which destroys the dullness of decaying cities? Change garbage graffiti, and does not change the sharpness a loaf of 30 cm of election posters stuck a bit 'everywhere, that is crumbling in the rain? Someone does not think that you could even give a hint of color to the city, or hold a public tender for the redevelopment of decaying buildings, bare and colorless sadly? If it were normal scuffs, obrobri smeared paint on historic monuments put to good then yes, word vandalism would have a higher meaning. But in circumstances when it comes to "change the character" of a tunnel, a concrete cast of shapeless, revitalization and giving it life, it would be better to apply all necessary safeguards and protect something that has a proven artistic value? No. It is not. Our cities must be gray with smoke, must be proof of joy, of feeling. Must be stripped of any emotion, because emotions are not for serious men. The men are hard workers and increase the country's gross domestic product. The serious men do not write on the walls. The men are serious children who someone has spoiled the children by removing the brush, pen, harmonica or any other instrument of freedom. The men have serious heavy bias otherwise would invite people to dinner as Bros, appreciated and respected writer in the world, that he even exhibited his works at the Palazzo Reale. Otherwise, leave the restoration of the darkest corners of urban decay and bleak for people like Daniel Nicolosi, aka Bros. serious men are serious but not cute, because they can not even understand what a revolution to do so would not only give new life to the city, but make it even more thanks to a thriving tourist curiosity that might attract. But even a public area designated for the works of writers would not be so bad. Would take very little, very little: some of the men 'less serious and a bit' smarter.
0 comments:
Post a Comment